RYAN SORBA

CONSERVATIVE AUTHOR, ACTIVIST, AND TV NEWS PERSONALITY

Ryan Sorba, Articles, Radio, and TV

Articles of Interest
Ryan Sorba's Substack

MassRessistance: The "Born Gay" Hoax




Ryan's research used as reference material: The Depathologization of Homosexuality: The Defeat of Science

The American Conservative: CPAC's Social War


Right Side News, Cliff Kincaid Defends Ryan Sorba's CPAC Speech: The Gay Infiltration of The Conservative Movement

The Campus: Conflicts at CPAC  

Special Thanks Given to Ryan Sorba

James O'Keefe thanks Ryan Sorba in his first book, Breakthrough (pg. 333)

Scott Lively thanks Ryan Sorba in his book, Redeeming The Rainbow: A Christian Response to The Gay Agenda

Radio

Bob Enyart Live: Archive of Appearances

Television

Ryan Sorba's YouTube Channel
Ryan Sorba's Rumble Channel
Right on the Edge on CNN


The "Born Gay" Hoax Lecture


Undercover Video1: 
Proving The "Born Gay" Hoax Again: Gays Admitting Sexual Abuse Caused Them to be Gay

Undercover Video 2: 
Proving The "Born Gay" Hoax Again: Men Admitting They Were Not Born Gay


Undercover Video 3: 
Ryan Sorba, James O'Keefe, and Hannah Giles in San Bernardino ACORN Investigation that Bankrupted the Corrupt Organization

Ryan Sorba's first lecture on The "Born Gay" Hoax in 2005



Ryan Sorba Explains The Definition of Marriage to gay activist Franklyn Kameny


Ryan Sorba Debates Carnival Barker Cenk Uygar
In this next video, Ryan Sorba schools Cenk Uygur in an unplanned spontaneous debate about the inherently detached from-reality (aka unethical) nature of same-sex romantic relationships and patterns of behavior. This debate took place at the 2007 Republican National Convention in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Ryan was just pleasantly walking down Radio Row and passing out Jerome Corsi's latest book at the request of his friend Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily, when all of a sudden, what should appear, but Cenk Uygar, and a big ugly sneer! Cenk asked Ryan to sit down and debate in the high hope that he might make some young Conservative guy look like a dupe for his Leftist show fans... but it was clearly Ryan who got the best of Cenk, until Cenk finally broke down at the end and threw a fit of slanderous rage to remind himself of his arrogant lie that he gets to make up reality as he goes and to distract his listeners from the fact that he made no argument or refutation, but just asked the same couple of questions over and over. Ryan easily answered all Cenk's "difficult" questions such as, "WHY NOT!?" and "WHY DO YOU CARE!?" Cenk never made a positive case for his own position nor did it ever dawn on him that the answer to his infantile couple of questions is simply "Because! That is how things work! Look, this is reality! Reality is to our Psyche as a Rock is to our Body! It is just There and it is True! We need to be connected to Reality/Truth like we need water, and like we need to be around trees and like we need trees to be trees, and like we need the sun to be up there, in the sky! We are what we are, and reality is what it is, and the conclusions of practical reason (ethics) flow objectively from self-evident irrefutable first principles as they interact with the self-evident reality of human nature (as in a syllogism A+B=C or (A) first principles + (B) the nature of a thing in reality = (C) how you relate to it and should act around it), and this growing pool of knowledge that we build from birth reveals what is actually healthy, reproductive, social, fulfilling to us, and what brings genuine and lasting happiness to people and societies. 

The first principle of practical reason (or ethics) is The Synderesis Principle, or the precept: "act for a purpose or goal, or pursue good." The Synderesis Principle is to Practical Reason as The Law of Non-Contradiction is Theoretical Reason. Neither principle can be refuted, because to refute it, would still be to use it: to set out to act for a goal (of refuting it), and no one can just act truly random for long -not even the utterly insane, and even if they tried for a period of time they would be doing it to make a point: that they can act random, as a goal. Thus, to attempt to refute the principle is to use the principle, and thus to still act for an end, purpose, or goal, and so this is the irrefutable self-evident first principle of all ethics or practical reason. 

Further, all the self-evident goals of the various aspects of human nature in particular are what is actually healthy for us, and so they bring us genuine sanity (aka lasting happiness). Just as one's rational when they make an argument must be "True" for others to accept our arguments and find them satisfactory so that we can communicate in a pleasant and healthy way in a space of shared reality, so also must actions be good and commensurate with what is true for others to accept us in such a way that we can engage in relationships in a space of shared reality. To dwell in the Matrix of illusion for long, in any way shape or form (including homosexuality) is to waste away in a famine of unreality to the degree that illusion consumes our thoughts and time, and illusion spreads into an evermore boring, unfulfilling, and unhappy state of fake. The distinct and real things outside our imaginations that rush in at us are what remind us that we are real, and that life is an adventure, and that we cannot continually just make up reality as we go along -or we will not go for long, not only because it would be dangerous in a real world filled with cars and cliffs and con-artists, but because how boring would that be? To make up reality for yourself  as you go is the same as to be alone, because no reality can get through the walls of your cell. Truth is to The Soul as Food and Water and Light and even a Garden Fun Park are to The Body. You cannot deny Reality for long before panic starts to want to try to break you out of your walls so that at least the reality of your cell will close in all around you. 


Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Blogger Widgets