So ... you spend all day thinking about gay men, post photos of yourself online where you have frosted hair and are in bathing suits and now you're telling us that you find a painting of a nude woman that isn't even made to be realistic disgusting?
Know thyself Sorba. Seriously - you are gayer than most of the gay people you complain about. You think that painting was porn? I suppose the statue of Venus is just spank material to you. I mean not to you per se (I assume Michaelangelo's David is more your speed) but really Ryan? A painting is porn? Breasts are pornographic? Do you have any ability to examine yourself at all?
The fact that you find that pornographic makes it obvious you know nothing about art. That nude drawing is in a classical pose like found in the works of Leonardo Da Vinci and Michelangelo. No one has considered their work pornographic since the days when it was taboo for women to show their ankles. The picture itself is not art, the drawing is. The picture is goofing around and if you think that is pornographic, then you are apposed to most of what is on the web. That is certainly not the only picture like that out there, so you should not attack a single artist for it. I don't think either of these women have anything to be ashamed of and you just need to grow up!
2 comments:
So ... you spend all day thinking about gay men, post photos of yourself online where you have frosted hair and are in bathing suits and now you're telling us that you find a painting of a nude woman that isn't even made to be realistic disgusting?
Know thyself Sorba. Seriously - you are gayer than most of the gay people you complain about. You think that painting was porn? I suppose the statue of Venus is just spank material to you. I mean not to you per se (I assume Michaelangelo's David is more your speed) but really Ryan? A painting is porn? Breasts are pornographic? Do you have any ability to examine yourself at all?
The fact that you find that pornographic makes it obvious you know nothing about art. That nude drawing is in a classical pose like found in the works of Leonardo Da Vinci and Michelangelo. No one has considered their work pornographic since the days when it was taboo for women to show their ankles. The picture itself is not art, the drawing is. The picture is goofing around and if you think that is pornographic, then you are apposed to most of what is on the web. That is certainly not the only picture like that out there, so you should not attack a single artist for it. I don't think either of these women have anything to be ashamed of and you just need to grow up!
Post a Comment